Home
DevCentral
Search
Configure Global Search
Log In
Transactions
T732
Change Details
Change Details
Old
New
Diff
Some of use use tmux + irssi/weechat on Ysul, and there are IRC bots. These applications are expected to be live H24 and can't be replicated to several machines without a disconnect/reconnect. To allow to update with minimal disruption, we could provide deployment windows every N weeks (2 to 52). Such windows would be in three parts: - Apply tasks needed to wait just before the reboot - Reboot the server - Apply tasks needed to wait after the reboot - Validate state If the state can't be validated, in the worst case, several reboots could have to occur, even if I can't really see a scenario where 2 successive reboots were required. A typical windows would be 1h, with a best effort to limit the service interrupt at 5-10 minutes. **Reboot or not reboot?** This makes difficult to restart the server. Frequent reboots is not a vital requirement, as excepted if there is a problem with the kernel, we can (and we do) hot patch the userland without reboot to apply security updates. Yet, 2016 servers management lifecycle tends to deprecate the 500 days uptime paradigm once the golden rule for FreeBSD machines.
Some of use use tmux + irssi/weechat on Ysul, and there are IRC bots. These applications are expected to be live H24 and can't be replicated to several machines without a disconnect/reconnect. **How plans reboot?** To allow to update with minimal disruption, we could provide deployment windows every N weeks (2 to 52). Such windows would be in three parts: - Apply tasks needed to wait just before the reboot - Reboot the server - Apply tasks needed to wait after the reboot - Validate state If the state can't be validated, in the worst case, several reboots could have to occur, even if I can't really see a scenario where 2 successive reboots were required. A typical windows would be 1h, with a best effort to limit the service interrupt at 5-10 minutes. **Reboot or not reboot?** Frequent reboots is not a vital requirement, as excepted if there is a problem with the kernel, we can (and we do) hot patch the userland without reboot to apply security updates. Yet, 2016 servers management lifecycle tends to deprecate the 500 days uptime paradigm once the golden rule for FreeBSD machines.
Some of use use tmux + irssi/weechat on Ysul, and there are IRC bots. These applications are expected to be live H24 and can't be replicated to several machines without a disconnect/reconnect.
**How plans reboot?**
To allow to update with minimal disruption, we could provide deployment windows every N weeks (2 to 52). Such windows would be in three parts: - Apply tasks needed to wait just before the reboot - Reboot the server - Apply tasks needed to wait after the reboot - Validate state If the state can't be validated, in the worst case, several reboots could have to occur, even if I can't really see a scenario where 2 successive reboots were required. A typical windows would be 1h, with a best effort to limit the service interrupt at 5-10 minutes. **Reboot or not reboot?**
This makes difficult to restart the server.
Frequent reboots is not a vital requirement, as excepted if there is a problem with the kernel, we can (and we do) hot patch the userland without reboot to apply security updates. Yet, 2016 servers management lifecycle tends to deprecate the 500 days uptime paradigm once the golden rule for FreeBSD machines.
Continue