Don't try to patch nanorc.yaml if missing
ClosedPublic
Actions

Authored by dereckson on Apr 19 2023, 21:31.

Tags

None

Referenced Files

	Unknown Object (File)
	Thu, Mar 27, 02:29

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Mar 24, 04:53

	Unknown Object (File)
	Fri, Mar 21, 07:52

	Unknown Object (File)
	Fri, Mar 21, 04:02

	Unknown Object (File)
	Tue, Mar 18, 11:01

	Unknown Object (File)
	Mon, Mar 17, 01:20

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Mar 16, 12:19

	Unknown Object (File)
	Sun, Mar 16, 10:38

View All Files

Subscribers

None

Details

Reviewers

dereckson

Commits

rOPS7c04fa0d6085: Don't try to patch nanorc.yaml if missing

Summary

Linux distro are still using Nano 5.x, so they don't have YAML
syntax highlighting.

This is a follow-up for 7800a1c610d2.

Test Plan

Deploy everywhere, no-op

Diff Detail

Repository

rOPS Nasqueron Operations

Lint

Lint Not Applicable

Unit

Tests Not Applicable

Event Timeline

dereckson requested review of this revision.Apr 19 2023, 21:31

dereckson created this revision.

Harbormaster completed remote builds in B4819: Diff 7789.Apr 19 2023, 21:31

dereckson accepted this revision.Apr 19 2023, 21:31

This revision is now accepted and ready to land.Apr 19 2023, 21:31

Closed by commit rOPS7c04fa0d6085: Don't try to patch nanorc.yaml if missing (authored by dereckson). · Explain WhyApr 19 2023, 21:31

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.

dereckson added a commit: rOPS7c04fa0d6085: Don't try to patch nanorc.yaml if missing.

Revision Contents
Changeset List

Path

Size

roles/

core/

userland-software/

init.sls

5 lines

Diff 7790

View Options

roles/core/userland-software/init.sls

Don't try to patch nanorc.yaml if missingClosedPublicActions