Page MenuHomeDevCentral

Improve inclusive terminology
Open, WishlistPublic

Description

An "Academic Survey on Discriminatory Language in Software" from Matthew Norflus, Department of Computer Science, Florida State University invited contributors of psysh, a REPL shell for PHP to answer a survey about potentially discriminatory language terms.

An interesting collection of terms encountered in softwares have been offered in the survey:

  • Whitelist/Blacklist alternatives (Allowlist/Blocklist, etc.)
  • Master/Slave alternatives (Leader/Follower, etc.)
  • Grandfathered alternatives (Legacy status, etc.)
  • Gender neutral nouns (folks, etc.)
  • Gender neutral pronouns (they, ze, etc.)
  • Sanity check alternatives (coherency check, etc.)
  • Man hours alternatives (work hours, etc.)
  • Dummy value alternatives (placeholder value, etc.)

Could we avoid those terms in our software as a part of our commitment for openness and non discriminatory stance?

In June 2021, INCITS published a standard with a guide of terms to avoid and alternatives: https://standards.incits.org/apps/group_public/download.php/131246/eb-2021-00288-001-INCITS-Inclusive-Terminology-Guidelines.pdf

Event Timeline

dereckson triaged this task as Wishlist priority.Oct 2 2021, 19:45
dereckson created this task.
dereckson renamed this task from Improve terminology to Improve inclusive terminology.Oct 2 2021, 20:25

That would help to have a search engine to browse and search all our source code to find such expressions. Hello T614.