Page MenuHomeDevCentral

Define how #nasqueron-ops should work
Open, NormalPublic

Description

We should determine how #nasqueron-ops should work

The initial proposal was:

A server log

Any action done on a server should be logged by an entry on the channel.

The Phabricator bot (hmmm hmmm) should then log the action, so it's available in Chatlog for reference.

Yesterday and this evening, we had a lot of operations issue, T710 T711 T712 T714 T715 T716 T717 T718 T719 and T720 but virtually nothing were logged on the channel.

A notifications channel

It were intended any incident, unresponsive server were immediately notified on the channel.

Yet, @Sandlayth noted we shouldn't clutter the channel with Phabricator notifications flood, so we can discuss on the channel.

Bilan: we have notifications in the void and we don't know when there are new Docker images rebuilt because upstream images has changed.

Or when @amj requested a SSH access, if I weren't there, the task wouldn't have been prioritized either, as no notification were done.

An operations work channel

It were also intended to discuss, organize operations work.

I don't know how notifications could affect this part.


So we should do to find a balance between being correctly notified of what happens and be able to work on the channel in the same time.

And in an ideal world, every notification should trigger an action, like handle the task or check the Docker image.

Event Timeline

dereckson created this task.

Assigned to Kalix so they can provide its vision of how the channel should work.

dereckson updated the task description. (Show Details)

We are preparing the list of notifications to remove:

  • Column moves
  • Subscribers add
dereckson removed Sandlayth as the assignee of this task.Mar 8 2018, 21:11

[ Mass switching long-time assigned tasks to user projects dashboards instead. ]